Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

I’m sad today: The senseless loss of Victoria (Tori) Stafford a brutal crime

When this little girl went missing it was the outcome that drove everyone.  It was the fear of a senseless murder an often to predictable outcome.  We ask ourselves the same questions again, how could this happen, why did this happen, who did it, what about the parents.  So what about us? What about society at large, what are we doing about it?  Nothing! In time this crime will unfold and we will all be deeply saddened by it, but what will we do?   

I have no answers as to what we will do because we always do nothing.  There are too many cases in Toronto that have come and gone with no real change.  So for this too I am sad. The sense of powerlessness and fear overwhelm me as I think of my own children.  The death penalty is always a good starting point. I think it’s clear in this case (yes I haven’t heard or seen the evidence) that these people are responsible.  If this is proven why not have the death penalty? What use in society do these people have? They are beyond rehabilitation so why pretend they have a use?
 
I think it’s time we think about how we punish people like this.  How can we stop this type of thing or at the very least give some sense of justice?

Post Obama Drama: Fixing the world in one single move.

 So now where folks?  

Obama has been in office for awhile now and things are not a whole bunch different. That’s not to say that he has and is trying to ‘fix the world’. But seriously, is it really his problem to fix? I don’t think so, it’s every one of us. We are the ones who have lowered the bar and allowed, accepted, participated in the dumming down of modern society. Our endless greed, selfishness and sense of entitlement has created an unbalanced distortion in the fabric of life. This distortion is seen throughout society regardless of your age, status, color or even where on the planet you live. We all bought in to it and road along. 

So where do we go from here?
 
Well ideally we check our own morale compass and realign it for what is right. When we do that all the other decisions will be easier and have more of an impact. I would like to think we would be able to see that but I doubt it. Too many people have vested interests and are fundamentally greedy. Our advancements over the past 30 odd years has done little to make a better social consciences. Instead we have deepened our thirst for more and now at any cost.
 
I don’t claim to have the answers, hell who does.  But, I do think a first important step for all of us to take is to look in to the mirror and ask ourselves.  Am I a good person? 

Occam’s razor: Use it everytime you listen to the media!

 Occam’s razor

 Occam’s Razor, also Ockham’s Razor,[1] is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar, William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony", "law of economy", or "law of succinctness"): entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem, roughly translated as "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity." An alternative version Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate translates "plurality should not be posited without necessity." [2]

When multiple competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam’s razor is usually understood.

Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as an heuristic maxim (rule of thumb) that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity, often or especially in scientific theories. Here the same caveat applies to confounding topicality with mere simplicity. (A superficially simple phenomenon may have a complex mechanism behind it. A simple explanation would be simplistic if it failed to capture all the essential and relevant parts.) <<Read More>>

Hobsons Choice: How to use it next time you’re in court!

Finally I found what I’ve always been looking for, ahhh yes Hobson’s Choice.

Wikipedia

A Hobson’s choice is a free choice in which only one option is offered, and one may refuse to take that option. The choice is therefore between taking the option or not taking it, colloquially formulated as "take it or leave it." The phrase is said to originate from Thomas Hobson (1544–1630), a livery stable owner at Cambridge, England. To rotate the use of his horses he offered customers the choice of either taking the horse in the stall nearest the door or taking none at all.
 
A lawyer told me about this minutes before I went in to court representing myself.  Now looking back I see how important this is. Ever turn made in the court that day I positioned my statements in a way that left little option.  That was critical to my success.
 
Can you believe it, a lawyer gave me free advise that ended up to be the most valuable piece of information I’ve ever had from a lawyer.